I thought about this as I was reading an article in the current edition of marketing news, one of the publications of the American Marketing Association. The writer, Elisabeth A. Sullivan does a credible job of attempting to provide a balanced view of the emerging concept of retro marketing. Unfortunately the views of those interviewed for the story appear to be too focused on tactics, rather than strategy. Imagine that.
While I completely agree with the notion that organizations should honor the traditions of their company, I don't think they should be limited to executing their brand strategy with nostalgic designs and slogans. Most organizations want to ensure that their time-tested attributes are recognized, but that they are positioned in a modern context. I am concerned that retro marketing will be viewed inside and outside the marketing arena as just another fad, without regard to the mission and core values of the organization. People take this stuff literal, especially when the strategy or tactic is not executed from a brand strategy.
So, retro marketing might be appropriate for oldies night or the way the NFL is honoring the original AFL teams by having AFL teams periodically wear retro uniforms, but the league itself is not attempting to look or act like the 1960s. Jerry Jones and other forward thinkers would not have anything to do with that approach, nor should you. Don't let your brand be diluted with too many references to the past by too many visuals, unless it is in the context of honoring your traditions , your mission and your core values and with a modern balance. As Sullivan says at the end of her article, "Don't ply your brand's history in a way that makes it seem mired in the past, outmoded, uncool, too much your grandmother's phonograph and not enough your trendy kid sister's iPhone 3GS." I agree.
I doubt you are trying to recruit or retain brand champions that thought your brand was relevant forty years ago.




