Since day one I have thought that the name Occupy Wall Street is confusing. When I hear or see the word occupy I think of take over, possess, capture and seize. Those have never felt like the right fit for what I think the purpose of the movement is. I was, and still am, under the impression that the people "demonstrating" are voicing their concerns about the financial services industry and the influence they have on the world's economy. And the fact that they were given huge bailouts by the government. I thought they were trying to do what they wished someone else had done a few years ago.
Although there now seems to be an increase in momemtum and the media appears to be getting closer to being in alignment, this branding process could have been much more effective with a brand strategy in the first place. When it is crystal clear what your brand stands for it is much easier for those who want to support your brand, your brand champions, and those who do not want to support your brand, your brand inhibitors, to do so. Without a brand strategy you look like you do not stand for anything and you are not sustainable.
Like many organizations or movements, Occupy Wall Street seemed to start out as a tagline, rather than a brand. A few people lock themselves in a room one afternoon and brain storm ideas for a tag. They do not spend the appropriate time discussing purpose, developing and then testing the strategy. As a result they come up with a tag that sounds like take over and is confrontational. When this happens your organization runs the risk of being influenced by those who do not share your purpose. Violence then erupts. No one really likes that do they? Or you let others like the media define you.
If you are going to have a tagline, have one that makes sense and represents your purpose. Something like Wall Street Divides. Manage your brand.




